If Hockey Had the Vote: McCain or Obama?
Today is a special day for our friends south of the border as they head to the polls to elect a new president. Here now for its last-minute endorsements of both candidates is the divided sport of hockey.
Hockey for John McCain
Hockey is a game that respects tradition and is
watchful of those who aim to “improve” it.
John McCain understands that hockey is a dangerous
pursuit, and no amount of visors can change that
fact. If you’re not willing to sacrifice a few teeth
for the cause, feel free to move to badminton and see
how you like it there.
Before you cast your vote today, just remember that,
if given the chance, fanatics like Sean Avery and
Jarkko Ruutu would destroy everything that hockey
holds near and dear to its heart.
As such, hockey needs a leader who will protect its
Second-Amendment right to bear arms.
It needs a leader who understands that enforcers are
peacemakers, not warmongers.
It needs a leader who will stand tall against the
proliferation of Patrick Kaleta.
It needs a leader who will give you Donald Brashear
when you pry him from his cold, dead hands.
John McCain is committed to ensuring that the men of
hockey are the best, most capable fighting force in
all of sports.
If elected, he’ll scrap the instigator penalty that’s
for years allowed rogue players to operate with
impunity. These enemies of the game must be held
accountable, and, occasionally – unpleasant as it may
be for some of us – force is the only way to
accomplish that goal.
Finally, Mr. McCain will put an end to the frivolous
hooking and holding penalties that only serve to tax
the pace of the game. He believes that hockey needs
less regulation, not more.
Hockey for Barack Obama
Hockey is in dire trouble in the United States. You
can join Mr. Obama and choose to solve hockey’s
problems or, like Mr. McCain, you can bury your head
in the sand and pray they fix themselves.
During eight years of President George W. Bush’s
leadership, hockey suffered unimaginable hardships.
These hardships continue in places like Atlanta and
Columbus and Nashville and Miami and Los Angeles.
Make no mistake – hockey is under attack from
ruthless, foreign raiders to the north. Without a
leader who’s willing to take meaningful action on the
economy, countless American jobs will be ripped from
the heartland and relocated to third-world locales
like Hamilton and Winnipeg.
But this is not just an election that’s concerned
about the economic state of the game. It’s about the
game itself, and how the game represents itself in
the global community.
Barack Obama believes that hockey should stand as a
beacon for cooperation and sportsmanship, not
thuggery.
Of course, Mr. McCain will tell you that hockey needs
fewer rules, not more. Well, sir, with all due
respect, perhaps you’d like to tell that to Brandon
Sutter, a young man with his whole career ahead of
him who’s being forced to recover from the type of
violence that’s come to epitomize the sport we love.
Mr. McCain, we’ve seen what happens when hockey is
left entirely to its own devices, and now we’re
saying, no more.
No more head shots. Elect Mr. Obama and they will be
phased out by 2010.
No more clutching and grabbing. Every player, fast or
slow, small or big, deserves the opportunity to skate
freely.
Mr. Obama believes that hockey is a great sport, but
he understands that the world is an ever-evolving
place, and that hockey needs to change with it.
(This article appeared in Tuesday's print edition of
The Province.)
Discuss "If Hockey Had the Vote: ..." with other visitors.
